Committee to recommend school closures in April

A citizen committee will recommend the closure of possibly four schools this summer as the DeKalb County School System works to cut costs by closing severely under-enrolled schools across the county, a district official said this month.

The committee of 20 residents picked by school board members and Superintendent Crawford Lewis will recommend the closure of four schools – possibly fewer or more – by August, said Dan Drake, the district’s director of planning and forecasting.

“I think we could easily close four schools,” Drake said.

Lewis provided a list of 23 schools considered as candidates for closure. A number of school closure scenarios will be created and debated, and the committee will present a final recommendation for the 2010-11 school year to the board on April 14 – the end of phase one of possible closings.

To determine which schools it will recommend for closure, the committee will look at projected school enrollment, proximity of schools to students’ residences, the impact of closure on the neighborhood, district long-range capital plans and the condition of the school, according to a district presentation to the committee on Feb. 9.

The district will hold public hearings on the first phase of recommended closures on May 6 and 11, and the school board will approve the closings on May 14.

Once the committee is finished with the first phase, it will move to the second, which will end in August with a second recommendation of school closures for the 2011-12 school year.

The closures will be part of a broad effort to consolidate space, save money and correct heavily lopsided enrollments throughout the district, particularly in areas where some schools have more than 500 empty seats. Otherwise, the district anticipates nearly 16,000 empty seats over the next seven years.

The enrollment imbalance is widespread in elementary, middle and high schools. Projected enrollments for next school year show schools across southern, central and southwestern DeKalb County with dramatically low enrollments, and the situation is projected to worsen by 2016-17, the last year of the school district’s capital improvements plan, which Lewis began in 2006.

Reasons for the districtwide imbalance are varied. Shifts in the housing market have pushed people outside central DeKalb. More students have enrolled in private, charter and home school programs. The district is also analyzing how serious No Child Left Behind’s school of choice policies contributed to the imbalance. The federal legislation allows parents to transfer their children out of an under-performing school to a better-performing one if they choose.

The committee plans to meet again March 4.

DeKalb County School System Superintendent Crawford Lewis selected 23 schools to be considered by a citizens committee for possible closure this summer. The committee will make a recommendation to close possibly four by April. 


1.  Allgood Elementary School 

2.  Atherton Elementary School

3.  Avondale Elementary School 

4.  Bob Mathis Elementary School 

5.  Clifton Elementary School 

6.  Columbia Elementary School 

7.  Dunaire Elementary School 

8.  Flat Shoals Elementary School 

9.  Gresham Park Elementary School 

10. Hambrick Elementary School 

11. Jolly Elementary School 

12. Kelley Lake Elementary School 

13. Knollwood Elementary School 

14. Meadowview Elementary School 

15. Midway Elementary School 

16. Peachcrest Elementary School

17. Rainbow Elementary School 

18. Sky Haven Elementary School 

19. Snapfinger Elementary School 

20. Toney Elementary School 

21. Brockett Elementary School 

22. Midvale Elementary School 

23. Smoke Rise Elementary School



Comments (16)

Tucker Mom
Said this on 3/23/10 At 11:03 pm
7 schools were taken off this list of possible closings at the 3/23/2010 meeting: Kittredge and Wadsworth, Midvale, Briarlake, Rock Chapel, Ashford Park and Bob Mathis.
Kim
Said this on 3/9/10 At 05:06 pm
I heard it rolls down hill. And guess where it's landing? On the heads of our children.

These people claim they do what they do for the children. Well, it's no longer obvious. It appears that they are, for the most part, in it for themselves. Any time you have people, who are already doing very well for themselves, making decisions that are not for the greater good there is a problem.

My children attend a school that received students from another school when that school was closed. A lot of students in a school meant for just so many. Okay, like everyone has stated these students had to go to school somewhere. And that was fine. But now my children's school is on the list too. As well as all of the schools in the surrounding area. My question, "why would you send students to a school, only to place that school on a list to be closed?" I'm not understanding. And if you closed what appears to be all of the schools in our area, where will my kids attend school? Will they be bused another school, along with the students already bused to the present school because their school was closed? Help me understand what is going on?

And my last question is, "How much do these board members make, that they are willing to close school, just so they can make more money?

Anybody else need an increase? I do, but at what expense?
anon
Said this on 2/24/10 At 06:04 pm
Part of the reason Briar Vista is low is due to the Montessori program. A 2 track school (offering raditional and montessori) would not only save money but would allow all parents to go to Briar Vista in that district. Currently, they are forced to opt out ifthey do not want Montessori for their children. They have lost at least 100 families due to the opt out option. The schools in the 200 range should go first
Osbourne
Said this on 2/24/10 At 11:05 am
No need to close the schools: if the committee does some brain storming and listen to the population it serves, monies can easily be found to solve the problems. Take a look at the inventory of talents within the community, and you will find solutions coming from the community. The financial problems can be solved, and the schools are "NEEDED". It is one thing for politicians who runs on records of tough on crime, more police and prisons to be very vocal; but are very "QUIET" on "EDUCATION". It is from a "truly educated, not book learned" society that makes a SAFE environment; not the "dumbing down approach" taken by ELECTED officials. Let us find creative ways of making things better. Let us be cooperative versus competitive. Schools are NEEDED not wanted. There are those who talk about being smart; how about being "Wise".
Deliverance
Said this on 2/24/10 At 09:02 am
Populations shift. Schools that were built in the 1950's or 60's in areas of population growth may have aged-out with few newcomers with children; or the areas could have gone more commercial. I see that has happened with some of the schools on the list. With the economy the way it is, I hope the school system can unload these properties to fiscally sound projects.
Denise
Said this on 2/23/10 At 08:48 pm
Whenever there is a deficit in the budget, the first place people look at are the schools.

I agree that there are high performing schools on the list that have housed schools due to overcrowding during the housing boom. There are many vacant lots that homes still need to be built on and when these lots are filled, where are these children going to attend school?

As a parent, I constantly volunteer my time, talents and funding (when available) and have noticed that we bus kids from all over the place to a predominately empty stadium versus holding these events at the home schools where money could be saved on busing and ultimately returned back to the budget. This is just one suggestion that could be used to help prune the budget.

The morale of many teachers are already low to due trying to meet the demands of completing paperwork versus teaching to accommodate a system (Esis) that is not providing parents or teachers with the necessary tools to correct a child's learning deficiency because they're focused on ensuring the student's can pass the CRCT.

However, how many children really learn and/or retain the information that is crammed down their throats the entire school year. Please note that I am not saying that teachers are not teaching, but a balance needs to be put place to teach children about the past and what they can possibly expect of the future. For example, I shared a 1964 magazine with several Middle/High School students and they had no knowledge of who Jackie Onassis Kennedy was. This was not only embarrassing but very sad:-(

I am just stating that as parents, teachers and administrators we really need to find out what can be done to improve the educational efforts versus busing children all over town or having their parents to drive all over town to receive what is suppose to be quality education.

My apologies to all if there are misspelled words, grammatical errors, fragments, etc. I am venting and had plenty of thoughts that I wanted to share.

I hope that before closing any of these schools that all efforts have been taken into account, and that the students, teachers, parents and administrators can benefit from the final recommendation from the board.
Tammy
Said this on 2/23/10 At 06:44 pm
Come on, there are too many kids out there that need these locations opened and too many families that cannot afford to commute their kids and then too many teachers that can't handle large groups, come on
Cathy
Said this on 2/23/10 At 11:00 am
From what I have been told at our school (one on the list) - the closing of each school only saves $500,000 - which is only $2 million towards the overall deficit. It seems to me that the cost of redistricting, busing kids further distances, adding trailers when classrooms become overcrowded will far exceed the savings they propose.
Michael
Said this on 2/23/10 At 10:45 am
what happens to the schools when they are closed? Will they be sold and the money from the sale go to the other schools?

I think the school closings are short sighted. Wheen enrollment increases again where will they put the kids if they schools are sold? Will they put the children in the back of the building in
trailers like Mary Lin elementary? Those building are not safe in tornado weather.
notagain
Said this on 2/23/10 At 08:16 am
The whole list of schools isn't going to be closed. The committee has been asked to recommend 4 schools. The schools on the list are there because they have lower enrollments as it relates to their capacity or are simply underenrolled and because they are near schools in similar positions.

In N. DeKalb (by the way the Tucker elementary schools are on the list) while there are some underutilized schools, there is no where to send those students if the schools are closed, because the surrounding schools are overcrowded.

By this time next year (December actually) as I understand it, the committee will announce a county wide redistricting plan that will touch most schools across the system. You can bet that those schools with smaller enrollments and capacity will be redistricted into.
Dee
Said this on 2/22/10 At 11:49 pm
It is really sad that all these schools will possibly close. My child attends a school that doesn't have proper equipment i.e (hand soap, toliet paper, paper towels, pencil sharpers, etc, etc). Whenever anyone ask the front office/school there is always an excuse. The School board should be focusing on the health and education of the schools and NOT closing them down. Also WHY are most of these schools located on the EAST side of town. Where are these children suppose to get their schooling. This is so sad and the folks we have elected into office should be without a JOB.
Rae
Said this on 2/22/10 At 09:19 pm
I agree with Alicia....why are most of the schools on the list in South DeKalb? I see very few that even would be considered Central DeKalb. And 3 of the 4 magnet schools planned to close are in South DeKalb. They are the Technology Magnet Schools (Clifton Elementary, Columbia Middle and Columbia High School). Their programs are very successful. Our school, Clifton Elementary just came back with several first and second place winners in the Technology Fair.
Cere
Said this on 2/22/10 At 07:34 pm
Much of the numbers have to do with capacity vs enrollment. For example, according to the projections, Henderson will have 21 available seats (under-enrolled) next year and 78 available seats in 2016. But Rainbow, while a larger school will have 149 available seats next year and 223 available in 2016. It's not just the enrollment numbers. It's enrollment compared to how many the building will hold. If there are two schools near each other, each with 200+ extra seats, they could be merged. It's a very tricky task to evaluate these schools and the school system needs to ensure that they are first working with reliable data. In the past, the data - even the capacity number - has varied quite a bit from time to time.
Alicia
Said this on 2/22/10 At 12:29 pm
It is very interesting that the schools recommended for closure are in the South Dekalb area, some elementary schools within blocks of each other. there are schools in North Dekalb, with student enrollment less than that of many South Dekalb schools, but those North Dekalb Schools are not on the closure list. This looks like a serious discrepancy to me. Schools in North Dekalb with smaller numbers are not even considered for closure

For Example South Dekalb schools
North Dekalb Schools are not on the closure list on closure list

Henderson Mill 460 Rainbow - 560
Briar Vista 391 Flat shoals 457
Livsey 354 Allgood - 600
Christine
Said this on 2/18/10 At 01:48 pm
That should have been 88 million
Christine
Said this on 2/18/10 At 01:47 pm
Well one of the things that I can not understand is if the County has an 8 million dollar shortfall why is Crawford Lewis being rewarded with an increase. Its disgusting. I thing that before they close the schools they need to cut his salary and the boards salary - Gee if they have not been able to control and regulate a budget then why are we rewarding them. Im my place of employeement I do not get rewarded for substandard work. Why are we as citizens not more outraged when are students will suffer due to mismanagement. They are rewarded a bonus and our children are shoved into classrooms with a larger number of students. Then we wonder why we can't keep or recruit great teachers. Something really is fishy about this situation and i thing the smell begins at the top
Post a Comment
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message: