Champion Home

Ellis combats efforts to remove CEO position at chamber meeting

DeKalb County CEO Burrell Ellis defended his position before the Chamber of Commerce in Dunwoody’s Ravinia Club on Dec. 7. The County Commission has recently pushed the removal of the CEO’s position to replace it with a county manager answerable to the commission. Photo by Jonathan Cribbs

DeKalb County CEO Burrell Ellis used a business chamber meeting this month to combat the County Commission’s efforts to eventually eliminate his position and hire a county manager instead.

While speaking before the DeKalb County Chamber of Commerce on Dec. 7, Ellis said the county benefits from having an elected CEO directly answerable to voters. He also said counties with elected executives are among the best nationwide, and that White House and federal officials give special consideration to DeKalb County because its CEO is elected, among other qualities.

Ellis’ speech was a direct response to recent news reports that claim a majority of the County Commission favors removing the CEO position and hiring a county manager who would take direct orders from the commission. Commissioners have talked about the issue sporadically in the past, though the effort to make a change has ramped up over the last month.

Commissioners have routinely complained that Ellis’ department does not provide requested information in a timely manner. A recent retreat revealed stark divisions after several commissioners said they’ve wanted early departmental budget proposals so they can prepare for the upcoming budget season. So far, they haven’t received them.

But this governance change effort was not started by voters, Ellis said, and represents only frustrated commission members.

“Let’s make sure that we’re addressing your priorities and not someone else’s,” he told chamber members inside the Ravinia Club in Dunwoody. “This is no time to play politics by drumming up make-believe issues.”

Several commissioners were in attendance, however, and Commissioner Lee May asked Ellis directly if he would be open to a referendum that would change the county to a commission-manager form of government.

Ellis’ response?

“I don’t know. I don’t think this issue is being driven by you,” he repeated to chamber members. “But if I’m wrong, you’ll let me know.”

Ellis said he had recently returned from a White House-sponsored jobs summit where he said he was the only county executive invited from across the nation. Metropolitan counties are some of the nation’s largest economic drivers, and federal officials are interested in the DeKalb County perspective because it’s a wealthy, metro county – and because its top executive is elected, Ellis said.

“The White House knows who you are,” he said of the CEO’s position. “I don’t say that for my own ego. [White House officials] wanted DeKalb County.”

The commission on Dec. 8 tabled a resolution supporting a referendum that would change the county to a commission-manager form of government. In supporting documents, the commission listed a number of reasons why it supports the change.

“DeKalb County could realize significant cost savings by transitioning to the Commission-Manager form of government,” the documents states. “A professional county manager appointed and directed by the County Commission would improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the executive functions of DeKalb County government while reducing political infighting and improving responsiveness to the Commission.”

The county’s previous CEO, Vernon Jones, also weighed in the issue in a written statement.

“Before further changes are made to DeKalb’s form of government, I would hope that public input is sought and that any future changes would have a positive impact on the citizens of DeKalb County,” he said.

The commission also added that 115 of 159 Georgia counties function under a commission-manager form of government.

County officials said the commission would consider the referendum again at its next meeting.

 


Comments (6)

Neigborhood Voices
Said this on 12/13/09 At 09:15 pm
What we see from the HOODS (Neighborhoods) is a few people (commissioners) without enough votes to make it as CEO wanting to still have control of the county. STAY IN YOUR PLACES!... Since you cannot conquer the CEO’s position or get more seats on the commission board to control it, you have swayed foolish commissioners to your point of views. We see that you are ardently working throughout aging mostly African American neighborhoods, to change the political schematics through the auspice of gentrification in Dekalb, using private, stimulus and neighborhood stabilization funding to gain future political positions and commission seats, too bad the commissioners of those districts can’t see they will be next after CEO Ellis is moved.
Our commissioners have eyes but cannot see, to take the power from the CEO is a way to take away their futures to become CEO. We the people selected the CEO why should the commissioners we selected for secondary positions have the power to take his position away or even want to?
Its time someone spoke up from the neighbor HOOD! It is time you tell the people what you are really up to from behind the scenes. COME CLEAN You are beginning to look like you have something you want to do that you want to hide from the CEO and the people. Half of you have not been serving the communities that placed you in office, we have not seen stimulus jobs, we see others working in our HOODS, we see other people with the jobs you claimed would come to us and our communities. You appear to be serving your own self interests and the interests of a few, who you will rely on to support your future campaigns as you try to move up the political ladder. Don’t you know the neighbor HOOD place you in office and if you support the masses in the (neighbor HOODS) you will have enough support from just doing the right thing for the right reasons to move up the political ladder without the negative neighborhood news that you currently have, which you have lost sight of and seem to not care about, notice or hear.
FROM THE NEIGHBOR hoods----Most of the commission board needs to be dismantled when the commissioners selected are no longer serving the interests of their constituents. We should also have the option to shorten your terms. The questions the citizens should be asking is why do the commissioners want to have control of the highest county elected seat as well as control of the appointed county manager, do they want to direct the county's money to special projects for future political favors without any questions asked, from any separate authority or oversight. If the jobs we gave you is not enough run for CEO. We are not unhappy homeowners we are unhappy VOTERS.
Dazed and Confused
Said this on 12/13/09 At 11:50 am
Alan, if the outcomes are similar, what will your study show? I think what you meant to write: we should study similar inputs under each model then compare the outcomes. For example, a county experiences an increase in property crime over x period, how does county A's (with a CEO) property crime rate change over time versus county B (with a county manager)? Under your approach, you would look at counties, with a CEO and with a county manager, who experienced similar reductions, we hope, in property crime and say: how did County A get there versus how did county B get there.
Said this on 12/12/09 At 01:11 pm
Here's what appears to be key in this debate, i.e., Ellis' comment that "counties with elected executives are among the best nationwide." This is an interesting debate, as it pertains to whether the structure of the relationship between the CEO and the commisioners for DeKalb County is optimal. Any change in the relationship should be driven by careful study of the outcomes under models of both the current configuration and similar outcomes under the proposed, changed configuration, no?
Garry Owen
Said this on 12/12/09 At 12:42 pm
I wish we had an elected CEO instead of a county manager that feels no responsibility to answer to anyone! Al least we could vote a do nothing CEO out of office.
Stop whinning!
Said this on 12/12/09 At 12:53 am
The CEO is responsible for the county day to day operations. There needs to be a separation of power. The commission is like the legislative branch of the federal government. If the commissioners are having problems with getting information from the CEO, put it in an AJC vent. Everyone reads the Vent. Our county commissioners are constantly deferring business to the next meeting. It's a wonder they pass anything. As seen in the last line of this article.
Hey!
Said this on 12/11/09 At 12:05 pm
Hey Lee May, county commissioners in place to set a course for the county, not to get their hands involved in actually running county operations. I don't trust you, Larry Johnson or Connie Stokes to not meddle as much as possible. Let it go.

New comments are currently disabled.


Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for News Alerts